logo-darklogo-darklogo-darklogo-dark
  • Tool Categories
    • 🎨Art & Creative Design505
    • 🏢Business Management644
    • 💻Coding & Development514
    • 👮Detection83
    • 🧠General Use728
    • 🏥Health & Wellness55
    • 📷Image & Photo Analysis100
    • 🖼️Image Generation & Editing618
    • 📐Interior & Architectural Design37
    • 🎓Learning & Education483
    • ⚖️Legal & Finance90
    • 🎭Lifestyle & Entertainment236
    • 📢Marketing & Advertising627
    • 🎧Music & Audio138
    • 👔Office & Workplace1,014
    • 🔬Research & Data Analysis373
    • 👥Social Media245
    • 🎥Video Generation & Editing426
    • 👧🏻Virtual Companion135
    • 🎤Voice Generation & Editing381
    • ✍️Writing & Editing808
    • All Categories
    • AI Use Cases
  • News
  • Events
    • Academic Conferences
    • Developer Conferences
    • Expos / Trade Shows
    • Industry Summits
    • Workshops / Training
    • All Events
    • Past Events
  • Saved Tools
  • Suggest a Tool
✕
Home › News › Ex-Perplexity engineer raises $5.7M for Polar, an AI browser built for knowledge workers

Ex-Perplexity engineer raises $5.7M for Polar, an AI browser built for knowledge workers

July 29, 2026
Three colleagues posing for a team photo in a bright, plant-filled office with computers in the background.

#image_title

The first wave of AI browsers mostly failed because they were built for the wrong people. Kevin Jiang, who worked on Perplexity’s Comet browser before leaving to start his own company, has a clear read on why: consumers don’t book flights every day. According to TechCrunch, Jiang’s new startup, Polar, has now raised a $5.7 million seed round led by Madrona to build something different: an AI browser aimed specifically at knowledge workers.

The timing is worth understanding. In 2025, the AI browser space was crowded and loud. OpenAI had Atlas. The Browser Company had Dia before selling to Atlassian. Firefox added AI features and then got criticized for it. Most of these products tried to replace default search or let users chat with their tabs. Jiang’s argument is that none of that was ever compelling enough to change someone’s daily habits, because the tasks being targeted weren’t frequent enough to matter.

Polar takes a different approach. Instead of chasing mass-market behavior, it targets professionals in sales, recruitment, marketing, research, and business operations, people who spend most of their working hours inside a browser and run repetitive tasks constantly. With Polar, users can schedule workflows, save prompts, and assign tasks to agents based on their open tabs. The company says non-technical users can run it without any setup complexity.

The browser is free, with a limited number of daily AI credits included. Paid plans start at $20 per month for higher usage. Interestingly, Polar says most current users run it alongside another browser, treating it as a dedicated automation tool rather than a full daily driver. The startup isn’t bothered by that. Its goal is to be the best place to automate browser-based work, and it’s open to expanding into areas like computer use down the road.

The investor perspective matters here. Sabrina Albert, a partner at Madrona, pointed out that building reliable agentic work on the open web is genuinely hard, and that a browser has structural advantages: it sees exactly how users interact with sites, and users are already logged in to the services they use most. That login access is a real technical edge for running agents that need to act on someone’s behalf.

The round also included ex-GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke, Phia founder Phoebe Gates, Modal CEO Erik Bernhardsson, and several other founders. The backer list skews technical and operator-heavy, which fits the product’s positioning.

The broader shift in this space is real. Startups like Browser Use, Strawberry, and Aside are all building with an agentic angle now. Perplexity’s Comet has moved in that direction too. But most are still general-purpose. Polar’s bet is that going narrow, specifically knowledge work, gives it a cleaner path to actual retention. That logic is sound. The question is whether it can build enough reliability into the agent layer to make professionals trust it with real workflows.

Share

Related news

Wisp Flow branding logo in orange on a dark teal background. (Logo shows the text 'Wisp Flow' with an icon on the left)

#image_title

August 3, 2026

Wispr Flow is moving into meeting notes, and the timing makes sense


Read more
Collage showing Gemini branding with Seattle skyline, a dark 'Thinking it through' task list, a white airport status card, a floating 'Take over task' bubble, and a green 'Task done' banner.

#image_title

August 3, 2026

Gemini Spark can now browse Chrome on your behalf


Read more
Person typing on a laptop with an AI chat interface visible on screen.

#image_title

August 3, 2026

EU AI Act transparency rules are now live — here’s what they actually require


Read more

Recent Posts

  • Wispr Flow is moving into meeting notes, and the timing makes sense
  • Gemini Spark can now browse Chrome on your behalf
  • EU AI Act transparency rules are now live — here’s what they actually require
  • Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max is its biggest model yet, and it’s open source
  • June wants AI to fix AI deployment, and Marc Benioff just bet $20M on it
Best AI Tools

Discover the best AI tools for any use case

Explore
  • Tool Categories
  • AI Use Cases
  • AI Events
  • AI News
  • Saved Tools
Company
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Media & Partnerships
  • Suggest a Tool
Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Copyright © 2026 Best AI Tools 415 Mission Street, 37th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105